Showing posts with label team gawain. Show all posts
Showing posts with label team gawain. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 18, 2017

Forgiveness. Can you imagine?

I think this is the first story we’ve read that has a proem, unless the prologues in Chaucer’s The Canterbury Tales count as proems. Anyway, the proem describes the origin of the conflict in “Sir Gowther”—namely, that demons rape human women and make them bear their literal hellspawn. Hang on, supernatural beings fathering half-human children? That sounds familiar . . .


Dangit Zeus.

The last three lines of the proem are as follows: “I’ll tell you instead of a warlock great / Who caused his mother’s heart to break / With all his deeds so wild” (22-24). However, though Gowther’s deeds are indeed wild and heinous and altogether terrible, they do not seem to be the deeds of a warlock since none are magical in nature. The only ones that might be magical in nature are the slaughters of Gowther’s wet nurses and the tearing off his mother’s nipple (ouch), because I’m pretty sure babies are not strong enough to do any of that no matter how hard they try! Then again, this is from the same genre that has knights slicing their foes cleanly and precisely in two, so maybe I should stop analyzing the realism of Gowther’s actions. That being said, the text later refers to Gowther’s father as “the warlock wild” (674), so maybe “warlock” is another term for “evil one.”

One more thing about the proem: it makes no mention of the warlock’s penance and redemption. This gives the impression that the story will just be about a monster of a man who keeps doing worse and worse things until he has destroyed everyone and everything in Europe. Alternatively, this gives the impression that the most important parts of the story are about Gowther’s terrible deeds. I disagree; Gowther’s penance and redemption are so important! Gowther is half-fiend, and yet his mother (who knows his hellish heritage) treats him about the same as she might a fully human child, the Pope allows him penance, and God answers Gowther’s prayers. One might argue that a tendency toward harm is inherent and strong in a half-fiend, and Gowther’s acts as an infant support this. Also, Gowther easily listens to the Devil, as “He’d always work his father’s will / Wherever he might fare” (176-177). One might say that Gowther is a lost cause, that there is no use in trying to teach him to be good and to follow God. Yet the people who raise Gowther do that, and even better: God shows mercy to a half-demon.

Did Christians find a strange sort of comfort in this story back when it first circulated? I figure if the Lord will forgive a half-demon for his sins, then He will surely forgive ordinary humans for theirs.


Osborn, Marijane, translator. Nine Medieval Romances of Magic. Broadview Press, 2000.

I pledge that I have neither given nor received any unauthorized aid on this assignment.
Miranda A. Barrientos

Sunday, April 16, 2017

Wicked Mommy Dearest

So, surprisingly, I had a difficult time getting through Emaré. I am not sure what happened between Sir Orfeo and Emaré but I was just not feeling this tale. With Sir Orfeo, I had all the elements that I like to see from a retelling: Supernatural elements, whimsical words, a drastic change from the original plot (like, hello!?, did NOT see that happy ending coming), and lots of lurrrrrve. But Emaré was just "meh" for me. Nothing really stood out to get me all hyped up about her or her story.

But, as anyone who knows me knows, I LOVED the evil, wicked, mother in law figure. Personally, my relationship with my mother-in-law isn't the best. In fact, it's pretty terrible since I don't like her and she doesn't like me. But that's neither here nor there. I have been WAITING DESPERATELY, for an evil female figure and she's finally here, guys! She's here!


I love evil. Whether that be good ol' Lucifer, Evil Queens, villains, monsters, Gretchen Weiners. I'm a fan, like you have no idea. So when I found an evil queen in Emare? It was on.



Seriously, she makes this story, for me. Her bitchy "unkind" words: YASS, The evil laugh/plot "Then said the angry queen, turning for home, 'I do not mean to stay to see you wed'". How you like them apples?! Then she writes a ton of "evil letters" that throw the whole plotline into disarray. And she's known as the "wicked queen". Like, that's awesome.

So thank GOD, for this evil queen because without her, I don't think I would have made it through Emaré's story. I don't think I would have a shred of interest.


Monday, April 3, 2017

Lewdness, Mockery, and Other Things Of Course This Miller Would Include

Maybe I just don’t get offended as easily as I think I do, but I’m??? Not??? Offended??? Let’s go through the possible things with which one might take offense:
-Claiming God told you something He didn’t: I suspect people do this all the time in real life, and I’m a million times more concerned about that than about what one horny little clerk does in one story. As for what said horny clerk (Nicholas) uses it for, well, he could’ve come up with a different plan, but this is the one he went with. Honestly, I found the setup to the story’s later antics a little dull.
-Mooning: Meh? The miller is telling this story. For those of you who haven’t read the general prologue, he tends toward lewd stories anyway. He’d probably be great at Cards Against Humanity if he understood Modern English and all the cultural references.

“Who is Michelle Obama and what is it about his armes?”
“This card has too many words. I cannot understand them alle.”

Anyway, I’m actually glad that the hair on Alison’s rear end is portrayed as normal. People have body hair! Who would’ve guessed?
-Accidental butt-kissing: It was an ACCIDENT on that dork Absolon’s part. What part of “Abak he stirte, and thoghte it was amis, / For wel he wiste a womman hath no berd; / He felte a thing al rough and long y-herd, / And seyde, ‘Fy! Allas, what have I do?’” do you not understand (3736-3739)?
-Farting: Meh? I would just repeat what I said about mooning. Sure, it’s not the kind of thing you want to read while eating, but . . . meh?
-Adultery: To the students taking ENGL222, or whichever other class might read this:

As for us, we’re more than halfway through ENGL284. We have read so many stories about people cheating on their spouses and courting people who are already married that I’d be surprised if anyone isn’t at least a little desensitized to such tales.

One more thing: Would you agree that, out of everyone in this story, the carpenter John is most similar in social status to the miller? Why do you think he told a story in which a guy like him is so blindingly trusting of his horny clerk friend? Why not make a fool of the educated clerk? My guess is the miller is making a bit of fun of his upper-class and better-educated travel companions. Sure, Nicholas might be clever, but he is committing adultery (which they all would have claimed to disapprove of) and he gets his butt burned with a hot poker. Then there’s Absolon, who’s just a doof throughout this entire story (though burning Nicholas’s butt with a hot poker was a quality move there).

Considering all this, would you want to hear more stories from the miller? I might, just as along as I’m not eating while listening!

Chaucer, Geoffrey. The Canterbury Tales. Edited by V.A. Kolve and Glending Olson, W. W. Norton & Company, Inc., 2005.

I pledge that I have neither given nor received any unauthorized aid on this assignment.

Miranda A. Barrientos

Monday, February 27, 2017

Loose Threads

Did anyone else notice any loose threads in this story? Let’s review:

Yvain goes to the spring to defeat the knight guarding it and avenge his cousin’s honor. Once he gets stuck in the lady’s castle, his love for the lady aside, his honor prevents him from escaping and returning home: “Since no one would ever believe in the success of his quest [unless he brought the corpse with him], he was ashamed to leave” (de Troyes 275). However, when King Arthur’s entire court arrives to the castle after Yvain marries his lady, no one??? Asks??? About his vengeance quest??? Does that not matter anymore?

The lady (hereafter referred to as Magic Spring Lady, because she has no name but she does have a magic spring) asks Yvain, “And would you dare undertake the defense of my spring for me?” (de Troyes 281). Yvain says he will, and we see him protect the spring from Unferth Kay, but when he goes away, who protects the spring? Yvain and Magic Spring Lady add exceptions to their agreement in case Yvain is imprisoned or becomes too ill to move, but they completely forget the spring. Isn’t the spring important? It seems important. It is ridiculously beautiful, almost indescribable, and guarded by a fierce fighter. Why wouldn’t Magic Spring Lady remember her magic spring? Who’s defending the spring now that Yvain has been away from Magic Spring Land for too long? I can’t imagine Magic Spring Lady doing it. She seems like she would much rather fight with words than with lance and shield. (Maybe she made Lunete do it . . .)

A vavasor and a beautiful maiden provide hospitality to both Calogrenant and Yvain while the knights are on their way to Magic Spring Land. We never hear from either of them again. Do they just . . . kind of . . . not actually matter? I would’ve thought the maiden at least would have mattered, just because beautiful women tend to matter in these kinds of stories. But . . . I guess not?

Maybe the next part of the story will tie up at least one of these loose ends. Maybe we’ll hear more about the sun and the moon.


Source (PSA: always credit the artist)

I pledge that I have neither given nor received any unauthorized aid on this assignment.

Miranda A. Barrientos

Wednesday, January 25, 2017

Rules of Love: Restrictive or Freeing?

Did anyone else get the impression from the readings that courtly love makes love more confusing and frustrating than it already is? Call me individualistic, but there’s something not quite right about spelling out particular rules for something that is so personal and intimate and variable. No couple will have exactly the same love as another, so why try to standardize it so completely? If this is love, then I’m not so sure I want to get involved.

And yet, Rule 8 of Love is “No one should be deprived of love without the very best of reasons” (Capellanus 185). Great.

Capellanus establishes “no homo” in Chapter 2, but I bet he never thought of this! My roommate has an out!

Courtly love’s relationship with marriage also threw me off . . . at first. Then it intrigued me. “Feudal nobility arranged marriage to suit families’ advantages, often while the children were still infants” (Thompson). Yet the rules of courtly love and the stories that concern them don’t seem too concerned with honoring these marriages if love conflicts. After all, Rule Number 1 of Love is don’t talk about—er, I mean, “Marriage is no real excuse for not loving” (184). We see this played out too perfectly in the summary that Dr. Diane Thompson gives of Marie de France’s Eliduc. Eliduc’s wife seems to experience no anger or pain from her husband falling in love with another woman. To me, she seems a little too content to become a nun while Eliduc marries his new love.

Marriages arranged for advantage, convenience, and gain have no promise of love for the spouses-to-be. Perhaps Eliduc and his first wife were in a loveless arranged marriage. Perhaps they really were happy to leave each other. Perhaps tales of courtly love, and the prioritization of love over marriage vows, provided hope and comfort to nobles in arranged marriage. Just as many people today (myself included) enjoy stories that provide an escape, maybe stories of courtly love provided an escape from the reality of marrying for social climbing and political alliances rather than for love.

"I am determined that only the deepest love will induce me into matrimony. So, I shall end an old maid, and teach your ten children to embroider cushions and play their instruments very ill."



Wow. We've needed the comfort and daydreams a lot over the centuries, haven't we?

Capellanus, Andreas. The Art of Courtly Love. New York: Columbia University Press, 1960.

Thompson, Diane. “Courtly Love Study Guide.” Northern Virginia Community College.

I pledge that I have neither given nor received any unauthorized aid on this assignment.

Miranda A. Barrientos