Sunday, February 26, 2017

Tony Beers (for Monday Feb 27? A bit confused as to where we are now)

The Knight with the Lion

So far this story, for me, is by far the most accessible in that both it's romantic and militaristic interludes are fewer, focusing primarily on Yavain’s travels and the subsequent “spell” he falls into after being captured by the “Lady’s” men in her castle. Just catching sight of her, he cannot be deterred, indulging all his service, attention, and will to her -- he is done for. The battles or duels are less frequent with less detail than the other stories. Chretien appears to favor more description of the inner thoughts and romantic workings of his primary characters, here, rather than flooding us with encounter after encounter -- whether duels or romantic gestures and conquests along the way -- preferring to draw us in to love’s poetic capacity and the fortitude with which matters of the heart can
strike us all so deeply.

Such strength Chretien’s love “malady” brings, that even an honored and respected powerful knight cannot escape its grip. Chretien’s “Erec and Enide” and “Knight of the Cart” do not hold the deep interior emoting the author brings to “Yavain” in this story. All these romantic fantasies, including Marie de Frances’s, have the common thread of the spell of love overwhelming their characters to the point of misbehavior and so often murder (Bisclavret’s wife and lover were certainly rendered insane by this “super drug”); but this one really got to me.

A common element in all three Chretien stories, “The Knight of the Cart”, “Erec and Enide” and “The Knight with the Lion”, that does persist, is, I suppose a necessary one to dramatize and highlight how honorable and worthy these knights were (some of them, not all); the evil “Dwarf” ingredient in Erec and Enide and again in Knight of the Court, appears in The Knight with the Lion as Kay, the seneshal, with his sharp tongue that stirs the eventual challenge accepted by Yavain, beginning his journey away from King Arthur’s court.

One question I have, though, is while the love emoted by Yavain and subsequently his Lady, appears plausible (for me anyway), her granting him leave to go with Gawain to Arthur's Court FOR A YEAR, just after marrying, doesn't seem a plausible move on her part – nor wood I expect Yavain to overstay the year contract , given the strength of his feelings. I did like, and could relate to, the insanity Yavain went through after his beloved rejected him completely when the year had passed without a word from him. That he goes mad and naked into the forest is both humorous and painful to read, depending on ones intimate relationship with a rejection and heartbreak.

5 comments:

  1. (Last line typo: ..."depending on ones intimate relationship with rejection and heartbreak." No A before rejection)

    ReplyDelete
  2. I noticed a contrast between Chretien's writing in "The Knight with the Lion" and, specifically, "Eric and Enide" too. He definitely focuses more on mental thought and romance in "The Knight with the Lion," while he focuses more on plot events in "Eric and Enide." "The Knight with the Cart" is sort of a halfway point for me. With Lancelot, Chretien seems to balance thought with action. I just can't decide which of the two (thought or action) is more important to a romance. The easiest (and probably true) answer is that a romance needs both, so I think "The Knight of the Cart" is his best romance. However, I'm not in this just for the romance. Personally speaking, action makes a better story, so it's my opinion that "Erin and Enide" is the best because Erin and Enide DO things together and don't play any of those love games that characters in the other two romances play.

    Amanda

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hey Tony!
    I totally agree with your analysis on the difference between action and inner monologue in "The Knight with the Lion". I LOVE how much, as a reader, we are learning about both Yvain and his lady love. It is the inner workings of the mind that really rationalize our actions and to not have that in Chretien's previous works is really quite aggravating. For example, I would have LOVED to see Enide's thoughts on Erec bossing her around the whole damn time in their love story. Or even Guinevere's thoughts the whole damn time she's playing games. I just want thoughts period. Less action. More thoughts.
    I understand that action is there to spur the plot along, but sometimes a reader, or listener, wants to connect with the characters they are interacting with and if you have no depth to those characters then why should I care about their next journey?
    Great post!!

    ReplyDelete
  4. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  5. If you recall in Erec and Enide...it was Erec's lack of action (fighting and gaining honor) that caused Enide to speak up and question him. He was not out battling, and when his reputation took a hit she was so concerned she grieved and brought up this negative fact to his face. There's even a line on page 287 (Knight w/Lion story) saying "A woman quickly withdraws her love--and has every right to do so--and despises a man, in the realm where he is lord, who regresses because of her." And thus, I think the reason Laudine (Yvain's wife, 283) was okay with him leaving so soon was to uphold these values...to love only a strong and honorable husband (even if far away), and thus support his honorable quests. Plus, since King Arthur ended up NOT invading her land, there is no imminent threat that she needs him to protect her and her people from. I believe her feelings for him though, were the reason she put a firm day for returning. I'm not convinced their feelings for each other were very deep...Sir Yvain claims himself that he fell in love with her beauty alone (pg 281), and Laudine seems to have chosen him out of logic (however twisted, pg 277).

    ReplyDelete